On whether the First-Second Council forbids not to commemorate Patriarch
Some bloggers in the ROC say that not mentioning the Patriarch violates the canons of the First-Second Council and, therefore, may be a sign of schism. Is this so?
Some bloggers in the ROC say that not mentioning the Patriarch violates the canons of the First-Second Council and, therefore, may be a sign of schism. Is this so?