Elena Bohdan: OCU is a matter of national security

Elena Bohdan. Photo: LB.ua

According to the head of the State Service for Ethnic Policy and Freedom of Conscience, the OCU is a religious community with a certain voice and subjectivity.

The OCU as a full-fledged entity on the world stage certainly relates to national security issues. The head of the new State Service for Ethnic Policy and Freedom of Conscience Elena Bohdan told in an interview with LB.ua.

In her opinion, many people do not understand the importance of the Tomos in Ukraine.

“Before the Thomas was received, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Kyiv Patriarchate was not represented in Universal Orthodoxy and, as a result, couldn’t formally communicate with, for example, the Vatican or with European or world interreligious organizations. There were limited opportunities to communicate with embassies, international organizations, that is, it did not have a full voice on the world stage," explained Bohdan. “Now the OCU is a subject on the world stage, including diplomatic negotiations,” Bogdan explained. 

She specified that such communication intersects with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Office of the President, “and since our situation goes beyond the purely religious sphere and has a geopolitical dimension, of course, this cannot happen without the attention of all government agencies that are to some extent engaged in issues of state security. Thus, we go to a very wide range of structures – this is the President's Office, the Verkhovna Rada, and the Cabinet of Ministers, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Security Service of Ukraine.”

"At the same time, we must always remember where the line between national security and religious freedom in Ukraine is," the head of the State Service for Ethnic Policy and Freedom of Conscience emphasized. “If someone works to undermine the sovereignty of Ukraine or its territorial integrity, there should be a reaction to it. If someone works to use hate speech, to polarize Ukrainian society, there should be a reaction to it, in particular of the SBU. If we are talking about a choice who to belong to, with whom to pray together, with whom to be in eucharistic communication, we should leave the freedom of choice to the religious community. We may be very sad that someone refuses to pray together with others, but that is the right of this religious organization."

As reported earlier, the head of the liquidated UOC-KP Filaret Denisenko congratulated Elena Bohdan on her appointment to the post of the head of the State Service for Ethnic Policy and Freedom of Conscience, expressing hope that with her appointment "illegal preferences for privileged confessions will finally disappear" in Ukraine and "the UOC-KP and the state will be able to establish mutually beneficial partnership relations".

If you notice an error, highlight the text you want and press Ctrl + Enter to report it to the editor.


How has your life changed since the outbreak of war?
It hasn't changed in any way
My church has been seized by OCU members
My church has been damaged/destroyed by shelling
I'm going to another church because of displacement
Total votes: 15


Система Orphus