UOC rep: Phanar follows double standards in Ukraine and Macedonia

Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople

The Patriarchate of Constantinople’s policy towards Macedonia is inconsistent with its policy already being implemented in Ukraine, said Protopriest Nikolai Danilevich

The Patriarchate of Constantinople’s policy towards Macedonia is inconsistent with its policy already being implemented in Ukraine, Protopriest Nikolai Danilevich, Deputy Head of the Department for External Church Relations of the UOC, said in a recent interview with the Union of Orthodox Journalists (UOC).

Answering the question why the Ecumenical Patriarchate is interfering in the affairs of the Ukrainian Church while refusing to resolve the issue of the schismatic Macedonian “Church”, Fr. Nikolai noted the double standard being employed by the Patriarchate.

“This saga with Ukrainian autocephaly began parallel with the possibility of granting autocephaly to the Church of Macedonia, and our media and Greek media have written about it,” Fr. Nikolai explained.

Then His All-Holiness Patriarch Bartholomew announced in September that he would not grant autocephaly to the Macedonians as long as they use the title “Macedonian,” which offends his Greek sensibilities. Now the Patriarchate says it will not grant autocephaly because Macedonia is the canonical territory of the Serbian Church—although such concerns did not prevent the Patriarchate interfering in the canonical territory of the Ukrainian Church.

“At the Church of Constantinople’s Synaxis, Patriarch Bartholomew asked to convey that he will never recognize the ‘Skopje Church.’ He understands that if he recognizes it, he will become a stranger and have opposition in Greece. Moreover, he would also quarrel with the Serbian Church. As an ethnic Greek, he understands the sensitivity of this issue,” Fr. Nikolai continued.

The territory that today makes up Macedonia was transferred by the Ecumenical Patriarchate to the Church of Serbia in 1922, Fr. Nikolai notes, but not by a tomos, but a praxis—a document that can be revoked. It was a praxis that also transferred the Kiev Metropolitanate to the Russian Church in 1686.

“For some reason, Patriarch Bartholomew annuls the 1686 document, but not the 1922 document, although the situation is absolutely identical,” the Deputy Head explained.

“The problem with the Greek Church and the problem with the Serbian Church has placed Patriarch Bartholomew in a situation where he has to fight on three fronts, but not even the Ecumenical Patriarch can fight on three fronts at the same time,” Fr. Nikolai stated.

Furthermore, as Fr. Nikolai explained, the Macedonian Church has even more of a right to autocephaly because the people there are united in their desire, whereas Ukrainian Orthodoxy is divided into three camps, and a minority of the people are interested in autocephaly.

“But we see a double standard, political interference, and a definite inconsistency in the actions of the Patriarchate of Constantinople,” the Ukrainian Church rep summarized.

Earlier, the media reported that Patriarch Bartholomew did not intend to grant autocephaly to the non-canonical Macedonian Church. According to the Patriarchate of Constantinople, this issue is the sphere of competence of the Serbian Orthodox Church.

If you notice an error, highlight the text you want and press Ctrl + Enter to report it to the editor.


Is the creation of the Exarchate of the ROC in Africa justified?
Yes, because the Patriarch of Alexandria has gone into schism
No, this is the expansion of the ROC into the territory of the Church of Alexandria
Can't make up my mind yet
Total votes: 704


Система Orphus